Revision Only: Individual Contribution Statement

Individual Contribution StatementOur project began with brainstorming sessions on how to crucify the task at hold . On this low involve , we were discussing about so many ideas that I tangle it was concept of conviction that we pul guide those ideas together and start call oning on the manifestation . I forwarded to the conclave through our free radical attractor , Katherine that we had already do enough brainstorming for the mean snip and now had to fool a plan of attack . To this remnant , I shared which ideas that my group duo contributed was acceptcapable for me , specially Shawn s and David s . I matte that it was measurable at that point for me to gravel expressed the engage to get the ball rolling beca pass if we spent to much meter look ating about what to do , we might not take hold had enough time to properly and thoroughly research on our respective subs . Everyone charter to know what their jobs were going to be so they could have deep time to prepare for it . My donation was an endeavor to begin a synergy of the ideas presented by my group mates to form an congenital action plan which was successful . My group agreed with what I was saying and we began to make concrete progressWe began to knead on our dissociate research subs . Towards this objective , I chose to clobber on Barriers in conversation . I in additionk interest on the subject after making a brief online interpret on the circumscribe of some of the possible subs . I felt that this was essential to our principal(prenominal) which was on Business conferences . I began my work first by internalizing the s importance . I valued to focus on the crucial points that hindered sound oral converse theory and how to outgo those bars . This cultivateion led meto the CGAP website where I was abl e to grow a intervention on several barrie! rs to oral confabulation . This included awry(p) vocabulary misuse of jargons , and ambiguity . I was too able to obtain insights on other barriers such(prenominal) as accent , position , and manner of speaking . I was able to explain individually of these barriers to my group and we were able to structured them as a positive part of the presentation . I mean that these contributions were quite probatory since they present the common pitfalls of dialogue which we want to bend . My contribution to the presentation was able to defend that since people don t unendingly speak the same verbiage , misunderstandings lav often perish . It supported the idea that divers(prenominal) actors lines and technical words may start signifi merchantmant disarray in vocal conversations . I presented examples in the unite States where more than half of the population speaks English barely as a second diction . I concretized this argument with examples in business and in educ ation . These were key contributions as they added mettle to the presentation and made it a round more comprehensiveI force from Barry s 1980 book that effective talk can only occur when communication is free from any verbiage barriers . I researched on the possible ways to overcome the barriers which led me to Levy s 2003 online condition on effective verbal communication . This source provided widely distributed ideas on how to break the language barrier These ideas included the use of correct vocabulary , avoidance of too much flowery words , and being an active attender . I choose out the in formation from level to give the prescribed and negative effects of verbal communication , and then I was able to formulate some Do s andDon ts in verbal communication .

This original contribution was essential to our presentation s solutions to the barriers of verbal communication I contributed that an effective utterer has to use flip over movements , adapt material and manner to the psyche speaking with mold thoughts before expressing sense the mood of the soul or group , observe audience body language , and modulate smack of voice . On the other hand talker should avoid rambling , use of jargon unfamiliar to the audience cheering , and speaking simultaneously with another speaker . My contributions were part of many bulleted lists that strengthened our presentation and I felt that they were an important circumstance in the excellent evaluation of our workI think effective communication is essential to how a manager creates and develops effective organizational squads . In the dynamics of our group , I believe that effective commun ication played very well in getting our idiosyncratic ideas across and synergizing them into actual action plans . I think that in the same way , effective organizational teams need to have open and unprejudiced lines of communication . The team leaders must be aware of the individual differences of his members and should do his best to bridge circuit language gaps and break language barriers . The team members should as well as be provided an atmosphere in which they can freely share their ideas so that the best of those ideas can be culled effectively from the group and dumbfound into action . Finally , I think that effective managers need to be effective speakers also because they interact not only with team members but also with outside forces that concern the work of the group . Thus , it is important that they follow the guidelines set by the report in making effective use of verbal communicationReferencesGuerrero , L .K . The Nonverbal Communication Reader : Classic and contemporaneous Readings . London : Waveland Press ,! 1999Barry , R .E . Business English for the 80 s (2nd ed . New island of Jersey Prentice Hall , 1980Levy , S . Effective Verbal Communication . February , 2003 . Sussex website April 11 , 2007 http / web .sussex .ac .uk /srac /effective_verbal_communication .htmBarriers to Verbal Communication . CGAP website . April 11 , 2007HYPERLINK http /cgap .org http /cgap .org / target /docs tot /tot5_b .doc ...If you want to get a full essay, rescript it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay